French President Emmanuel Macron called on the United States on Wednesday not to abandon the Iran nuclear deal as Western envoys said Britain, France and Germany were nearing a package that seeks to persuade US President Donald Trump to save the pact.
Trump has described the 2015 accord, under which Iran agreed to curb its nuclear activities in return for the lifting of economic sanctions, as the worst deal ever negotiated and has threatened to wreck it by reimposing US penalties next month unless the three European allies agree to fix its "flaws."
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani accused the United States of seeking to unilaterally change the terms of the multilateral deal and derided Trump as a "tradesman" lacking the background to handle with international affairs.
Russia, China, Germany, Britain and France, which all struck the accord with Iran and US, see the deal as the best way to stop Iran from developing a nuclear bomb.
Before heading home, Macron acknowledged he expected Trump to pull out of the deal, based on his long opposition to it. He called for a new deal.
It is not clear what Macron meant by a new, comprehensive deal. One possibility is an idea, long under consideration, to seek to negotiate a successor to the JCPOA with Iran. Another might be for Washington and the three European powers to impose additional nuclear constraints on Iran and to threaten it with additional sanctions if it violates those.
Western envoys told Reuters that three months of meetings among Washington and the three European allies were culminating in a package of separate measures that could be taken against Tehran in the hope they would satisfy Trump and keep the deal intact.
"This is about convincing President Trump, it's not a new deal with Iran," a senior European Union diplomat said.
Britain, France and Germany have proposed fresh EU sanctions on Iran over its ballistic missiles and its role in Syria's war.
Trump sees three defects in the 2015 deal: a failure to address Iran's ballistic missile program; the terms under which international inspectors can visit suspect Iranian nuclear sites; and "sunset" clauses under which key limits on the Iranian nuclear program start to expire after 10 years.
Diplomats have cited progress on ballistic missiles and on inspections, but the "sunsets" issue remained unresolved.
One way to address the sunsets, sources briefed on the talks said, would be for the United States and the three European nations to define what a purely civil nuclear program might look like and to threaten consequences if Iran exceeded that.
That would technically leave the Iran nuclear deal intact but would, in effect, impose additional conditions on Tehran.
In Geneva, a US nonproliferation official, Christopher Ford, laid out such an approach without providing details.
"We are not aiming to renegotiate the JCPOA or reopen it or change its terms," he told reporters. "We are seeking a supplemental agreement that would in some fashion layer upon it a series of additional rules."
Richard Nephew, a former White House Iran sanctions expert, said there were disagreements among the Europeans on that.
"What I have heard is that the French are less opposed to that way of thinking than the Germans. That doesn't mean that they are necessarily keen on it, but they can see the value of that where as the Germans can't."
In Berlin, a German Foreign Ministry spokesman, Rainer Breul, said Germany would carefully examine the idea of a supplementary deal, but rejected changing the JCPOA.
"For us ... the highest priority is keeping the nuclear agreement and full implementation on all sides," he said. "The nuclear agreement was negotiated with seven countries and the EU and can't be renegotiated or replaced on a whim."
Macron tried to counter suggestions of dissent among the Europeans.
"I'm not saying: 'It's a fantastic idea and everyone must follow it.' I'm simply saying: 'What else is being proposed?'" he said at the news conference.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel will hold talks with Trump in Washington today.
Iran's president said earlier that foreign powers had no right to tinker with the deal, and questioned Trump's qualifications to grapple with a complex international agreement.